If US does not arm Syria's rebels, Arabs may
Washington, June 13, 2013
Among the consequences facing US President Barack Obama if he decides against arming Syria's rebels is that Arab and European states may step in more aggressively, perhaps further fracturing rebel forces.
Having watched government forces seize the strategic town of Qusair from the rebels last week, Obama's senior national security advisers have held a series of meetings on what more, if anything, they are willing to do to help the opposition.
The fall of Qusair, signs that the military balance may be tipping in favour of President Bashar Al-Assad, the entry of Lebanese Hezbollah fighters on his side, and the growing credence of allegations of chemical weapons use by the government have all triggered a re-evaluation of US policy.
Next week's Group of Eight summit will give Obama a chance to discuss options with leaders of Britain, France and Russia and could influence any decision to arm the rebels or otherwise do more to support them.
Diplomats and analysts said if Obama chooses not to arm the rebels, or to take a more active role in coordinating the flows of arms and money from others, he may find states such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar pouring in even more money and material.
The danger, they said, is that this could accelerate a trend in which outside powers arm and fund preferred militants in Syria, creating client militias beholden to their patrons and undercutting efforts to develop a unified rebel front.
"If there is no (US) decision this week, I think other actors will act. The Arabs can't afford to lose Syria," said a diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity.
"If we don't act ... you're going to end up with Arab arms and Euro arms being provided," said Aaron David Miller, a former senior State Department official now at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars think tank in Washington.
"The logical consequence will be to accelerate the degree of ... dysfunction, the lack of organisation that (already) exists among these groups," he added.
Arms and funding from Gulf states have flowed to the Syrian rebels for months, while European states such as Britain and France have made clear they are considering doing so as well. Under their pressure, the European Union allowed its arms embargo to expire, freeing them to provide weaponry.
In Washington on Wednesday, British Foreign Secretary William Hague hinted at the possibility of doing more to support the rebels, although he did not provide details.
"We've met several times ... to coordinate our actions and our diplomacy and our support for the (opposition)," he said of the core "Friends of Syria" group, 11 nations including the United States and its European and regional allies.
"We will continue to do that, and we may well have to intensify that in various ways over the coming weeks and months in order to make it more likely that we can achieve a political solution in Syria," he told a news conference with US Secretary of State John Kerry.
The US has balked at giving weapons to the anti-Assad forces in part because of close links between some of the rebels and al Qaeda and the fear that the arms could end up being used against Western targets and US allies such as Israel.
But Western diplomats said representatives would be meeting Free Syrian Army commander Salim Idriss - seen as a moderate who is trusted by US officials - on Saturday in Turkey to discuss possible new aid.
The first hint the US was revisiting its policy on Syria came with Kerry's decision to postpone a trip to Israel and the Palestinian Territories so as to stay in Washington and take part in meetings on Syria.
There are few signs, however, which way Obama may tip on the question of arming the rebels, playing a greater US role in coordinating arms and money from others, or perhaps taking a more muscular position such as bombing Syrian military targets.
It is quite possible he may not make any decision this week, or indeed anytime soon. Two diplomats said they did not expect a decision this week and analysts suggested he may well hold off until consulting other major powers at the Group of Eight summit in Northern Ireland on Monday and Tuesday.
Senator Bob Corker, the senior Republican on the influential Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on Wednesday he thought Obama would soon decide to arm and train the rebels, saying that was the best way to shift the balance of power on the ground.
"If I had to make a bet today, I believe that's what the administration is going to do over the next very short period of time," Corker said at a conference hosted by the Center for a New American Security think tank in Washington. - Reuters
More Miscellaneous Stories
- Girl, 9, dies after fall from 8th floor in Abu Dhabi
- Lebanese café brand opens Dubai outlet
- Bahrain poultry firm told to step up safety
- Customer dies in Bahrain cafe brawl
- Bahraini boys hurt while planting bombs
- Philips, Ericsson launch LED street lighting
- DuBiotech to set up first Halal safety lab
- Jotun to supply coatings for Makkah Station
- Raytheon wins $655m Kuwait Patriot deal
- Alwaleed Foundation lights up 3 Saudi villages
- Poultry farms strike may trigger shortages in Bahrain
- Oman seals Victoria food security pact
- Saudi woman, 80, donates $133m to charity
- New Saudi clamp on energy drinks
- Outrage follows Bahrain killer bomb
- Improvised explosive device used in Bahrain attack
- 3 policemen killed in Bahrain blast
- Dammam-Al Ahsa train service starts
- Egypt wheat supplies enough to last until June
- Expat killed at Saudi workers' holding facility
- 80 global speakers for Doha summit on family
- Restaurant runs up $47,555 phone bill in 4 days
- NZ minister to visit Gulf states
- Public-private tie-ups ‘vital for agri growth’
- China firm wins solar power project in Amman
- 15,000 attend Bahrain garden show
- Omani firms shine at top food expo
- Bahrain to set up national food company
- Dozens hurt in gas leak at plant near Doha
- Twelve dead in Qatar restaurant gas explosion